, not available on the GUI for now) that allows choosing a file system from a white list, defaulting to ext4. Overview of File Systems in Linux. Ability to create large volumes of up to 1 PB 1. Crypto2. Both btrfs and zfs feel like the worst options considering their overhead. A daily snapshot of Ubuntu 19. EarthyFeet. Btrfs Format은 데이터 관리와 안정성을 강화한 파일 시스템으로 파일 관리가 중요한 NAS 시스템에서 가장 적합한 포맷입니다. I remember being on ext4 using Timeshift but it only supports rsync–so slow. F2FS vs. ext4 can claim historical stability, while the consumer advantage of btrfs is snapshots (the ease of. The only case where XFS is slower is when creating/deleting a lot of small files. Sun Microsystems originally created it as part of its Solaris operating system. But btrfs is not by any stretch the default Linux file system. g. XFS, EXT4, and BTRFS are file systems commonly used in Linux-based operating systems. BTRFS was clearly in the lead when considering Documents – even better than ZFS with deduplication. 0 NVMe SSD was used for the benchmarking of these file-systems in different desktop use-cases. The ext FilesystemsBtrfs also has snapshots so you can revert back to an earlier snapshot easily, say you run arch and some update borks your system (highly unlikely), you can simply revert back to the last good snapshot. Seeking around those files which a DB will do may yield different. If fs performance is the only or most important thing for you, then use xfs - it's the clear winner, by far. Both. btrfs is da bomb yo. Ext4 has journaling on by default, and new users likely won’t know how to disable it to save read/writes on their SSDs. This is why XFS might be a great candidate for an SSD. Btrfs was 107% faster in initial read scores and 24% faster in initial write scores. Ext4 fs can read and write to Ext2 or Ext3 file systems, but the Ext4 it is not compatible with Ext2 and Ext3 drivers. A continuación, os vamos a explicar brevemente las principales características de EXT4 y de Btrfs. 0 File-System. Although Btrfs lacks stability and maturity as of this writing, it is more feature-rich than EXT4 despite this. This process have two main steps: 1. I would stick with ext4 for the OS. Dropping performance in case with 4 threads for ext4 is a signal that there still are contention issues. After a week of testing Btrfs on my laptop, I can conclude that there is a noticeable performance penalty vs Ext4 or XFS. It's not the most cutting-edge file system, but that's good: It means Ext4 is rock-solid and stable. Each one might work for you based on YOUR needs! Supp. Você pode então configurar a aplicação de cotas usando uma opção de montagem. Both Btrfs and ZFS offer built-in RAID support, but their implementations differ. XFS and btrfs are two advanced file systems for Linux that offer significant improvements over ext4. F2FS vs. Btrfs is not a successor to the default Ext4 file system used in most Linux distributions, but it can be expected to replace Ext4 in the future. Between 2T and 4T on a single disk, any of these would probably have similar performance. Linux File System Comparison: XFS vs. It would be interesting to see a new benchmark result of CoW filesystems BTRFS vs ZFS in real world 2022. ago. 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. Tính năng tự khôi phục tập tin. ZFS does have advantages for handling data corruption (due to data checksums and scrubbing) - but unless you're spreading the data between multiple disks, it will at most tell you "well, that file's corrupted, consider it gone now". NTFS OpenBenchmarking. It takes a second to snapshot, and deletes of a snapshotted tree what takes ext4 26 hours is a few minutes on btrfs. Note that everything with LVM is at the block level which has major limitations. Btrfs is a more modern file system, introduced in 2007. EXT4 vs. Approach 1: Build your own kernel, and tweak it's build config to pre-link btrfs. Rationale is native Linux nature, vs xfs being Linux supported. jkool702. But EXT4 is mature, rock solid, and completely reliable, and the standard for most of the linux world. BTRFS was clearly in the lead when considering Documents – even better than ZFS with deduplication. Mount the partition and test the conversion by checking the files. Depending on why you want btrfs, you could run zfs. The main thing is to use latest Linux kernels to avoid old kernel Btrfs implementation. Checksumming, along with copy-on-write, provides the key method of ensuring file system integrity after unexpected power loss. 2. F2FS vs. 5. - Linux Kernel 5. /boot/efi has to be FAT32 (assuming you are using it as the ESP and not just adding partitions extra partitions under /boot to test how robust the boot sequence is). Btrfs vs Ext4. But not enough users follow the guide on and instead do stuff that actually makes the system worse. . In Windows NTFS is used, while in Mac OS it is HFS, perhaps these will sound familiar to you, especially the typical FAT or its variants for. This article provides a detailed comparison of the three file systems to help you decide which one is the best for your needs. because it spans multiple partitions, it's less likely to fill up your hard drive. are two different decisions you have to make. Language: Format: Language and Page Formatting Options. 1 fell slightly short of the Linux file-system performance. Boot from an install CD, then convert by doing: # btrfs-convert /dev/ partition. But they come with the smallest set of features compared to newer filesystems. I developed an application recently and compared the I/O performance of both and found ext4 to be slightly quicker for my application which was really just opening and reading whole files into memory. If it is only about reliability and you're in doubt, go with ext4, imho. Unfortunately you will probably lose a few files in both cases. Linux File System Comparison: XFS vs. I remember being on ext4 using Timeshift but it only supports rsync–so slow. Just so perfect to roll back for some games and modding. When comparing XFS vs EXT4, XFS also offers unlimited inode allocation, advanced allocation hinting (in case you need it), and, in recent versions, reflink support. XFS vs Btrfs. (當然另一種做法是新增硬碟, 另外格式化為 btrfs. Btrfs vs. En el caso de los servidores NAS de Synology, tenemos la posibilidad de configurar EXT4 o Btrfs, de hecho, en el asistente de configuración de los volúmenes podremos elegir entre uno y otro sin ningún problema. XFS does not require extensive reading. 7. F2FS vs. There won't be any noticeable difference. (當然另一種做法是新增硬碟, 另外格式化為 btrfs. 再將資料再回存到 NAS, 這部份會花費很多時間. It is the evolution of the most used Linux filesystems (Ext3, Ext2) and promises improved design, better performance, reliability, and features over its predecessors. XFS is about as mainline as a non-ext filesystem gets under Linux. XFS still has some reliability issues, but could be good for a large data store where speed matters but rare data loss (e. This pre-dates xfsprogs 3. It's the only file system out of the box read/write/format supported by Windows, Mac, and Linux. Regardless what I'm doing the maximum transferrate (write) is between 40-60MB on ZFS. I've never had an issue with either, and currently run btrfs + luks. ago. Approach 2: Readjust things so the kernel and modules are on an ext4 filesystem and the data you most want to compress is on a btrfs partition. Here is a look at the Linux 5. In most cases that’s EXT4, but for Fedora, OpenSuse and maybe a few others it’s btrfs. Per the recommendation from RedHat: Another way to characterize this is that the Ext4 file system variants tend to perform better on systems that have limited I/O capability. XFS vs. both have hidden sharp edges, work differently, and have different design philosophies in terms of the command line tools etc. 无论您选择哪个文件系统，都要确保进行适. ) and if/how to preallocate metadata etc. Both are suitable for everyday use, but it's worth noting that ext4 partitions. 0 Intel Skylake 16384MB Samsung SSD 950 PRO 256GB LLVMpipe Realtek ALC1150 Intel Connection Ubuntu 16. to cut a long story short: If you want a common file storage between Unix and windows, exFAT is the best choice at the moment. NTFS Benchmarks Continuing on from yesterday's Linux 4. On multi-drive systems, the opposite might be true, zfs outperforming ext4. We believe that btrfs has the correct feature set and roadmap to serve Ceph in the long-term, but XFS and ext4. The only realistic benchmark is the one done on a real application in real conditions. Or when it came to testing the single Seagate IronWolf 6TB HDD performance, Btrfs and EXT4 were performing about the same with a. It's not the fastest but not exactly a slouch. 7. So với Ext4, Btrfs hoạt động ổn đinh hơn, dễ dàng quản lý hơn và tích hợp nhiều ứng dụng hỗ trợ tốt cho doanh nghiệp Quy mô lớn. Btrfs come with compression algorithms present in the filesystem, allowing data to be compressed at the filesystem level right when written to the system. But EXT4 is mature, rock solid, and completely reliable, and the standard for most of the linux world. On a slow Linux box with an ext4 filesystem, the same operation takes less than a second. You might also want to consider Btrfs for your array drives, but you should be aware of the potential risks. This would be an interesting test. That was many years ago, perhaps when btrfs was less ready. Ext4 Filesystem 其實你提到一個重點了. Files less than ~2KiB can be stored in the metadata section (“inline” in the b-tree nodes), so as not to waste most of a block. Share. /boot/efi has to be FAT32 (assuming you are using it as the ESP and not just adding partitions extra partitions under /boot to test how robust the boot sequence is). Checksum: if your file (or some metadata) gets corrupted, the checksum will detect and in some case. SSD optimization. Regarding boot drives : Use enterprise grade SSDs, do not use low budget commercial grade equipment. Ext4 is built on older technology, so it lacks modern file-system features found in systems like E2FS and BtrFS. 04 Disco Dingo was running on the Threadripper setup while using the Linux Git kernel from the mainline PPA. For example, my virtualization server is currently hyper-v and I use ReFS instead of NTFS for features like bitrot protection, checksums, ect. I’ll take XFS and/or EXT4 any day over rolling another btrfs filesystem that isn’t stable, but has a bunch of gimmicky features any day of the week. Btrfs El sistema de archivos Btrfs nació como sucesor natural de EXT4, su objetivo es sustituirlo eliminando el mayor número de sus limitaciones, sobre todo lo referido al tamaño. Both Btrfs and Ext4 have their own advantages. Btrfs es mucho más rápido de lo que crees basándote en esos benchmarks, ya que no se ajustan a tu caso de uso. Data Colossi & Data Centers: Ext4 is non-negotiable for handling extensive data transactions. ZFS is open source, it isn't "owned" by Oracle. 10 4. Ext4 seems better suited for lower-spec configurations although it will work just fine on faster ones as well, and performance-wise still better than btrfs in most cases. 불가능. Using multiple drives of varying sizes created a luks1 encrypted ‘single’ data and dup meta volume. I have 6 disks so I have created 3 logical disks, 2 SSDs each - just for testing. There was a higher risk than upon disconnection or loss of power than some of the files are truncated. Here are a few other differences: Features: Btrfs has more advanced features, such as snapshots, data integrity checks, and built-in RAID support. Btrfs is slower, especially on non-SSDs, because of CoW, but has a whole lot more going on under the hood in way of features and data integrity. file-system comparison, here are some fresh benchmarks looking at the Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS file-system benchmarks on a speedy WD_BLACK SN850 NVMe solid-state drive. Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS were tested in their out-of-the-box state / default mount options. Various internet sources suggest that XFS is faster and better, but taking into account that they also suggest that EXT4 is. For a future article will be a look at non-mainlined file-systems, including ZFS On Linux. It is intended to compete with the modern features of ZFS or Btrfs, and the speed and performance of ext4 or XFS. And the I discovered how many tools are out there to recover data from EXT partitions and how few for XFS. This is because BTRFS is optimized for handling small files, while EXT4 can struggle with multiple small files due to its delayed allocation. Agree. Ext4 vs ext3. XFS as a similar featureset filesystem manages around 99. To format an xfs filesystem correctly, use the flag -n ftype=1. Btrfs和Ext4都是优秀的文件系统，但在选择时需要考虑您的具体需求和使用场景。. LVM takes a set of block devices and presents the system with a new (LV) block device with a fixed mapping to physical blocks. XFS as a similar featureset filesystem manages around 99. Tính năng sao chép dữ liệu. The NTFS support was powered by FUSE. and probably also not xfs. See moreWith not having the time to conduct the usual kernel version vs. A number of Phoronix readers have been asking about some fresh file-system comparisons on recent kernels. The result of XFS is often more than three times lower than ZFS in this benchmark, and the difference with Btrfs and EXT4 is greater. All of these Linux. 0 SSD testing ran into a strange performance drop while Btrfs. Two subvolumes, root and home, are created from that pool and mounted at / and /home respectively. User quotas for each shared folder. ext4 4 threads: 74 MiB/sec. Each of these file systems has its own way of organizing data, merits, and demerits. 15 or newer (Please the same OS using same activating services and same apps!)Key Points: ZFS stands for Zettabyte filesystem. It's the fastest option bar none if you have enough RAM. . To have best performance use noatime mount option, and I also recommend to use mount option. Ext4 se basa en una tecnología más antigua, por lo que carece de las características modernas del sistema de archivos que se encuentran en sistemas como E2FS y BtrFS. 7. So I did two rounds: the. Ext4 and XFS are the fastest, as expected. It is backward-compatible with older versions of Ext. BTW, transparent compression can offset much of the performance penalty between using a fs like btrfs or ZFS and a more traditional fs like ext4 or xfs, depending on your workload. • 3 mo. It's an improved version of the older Ext3 file system. It supports large file systems and provides excellent scalability and reliability. #11. When running PostMark, ZFS came out far ahead of the UFS file-systems being more than ten times faster than. 3 XFS. It utilizes a b+tree structure instead of the traditional linear layout found in most filesystems today, allowing it to better manage larger datasets more efficiently than other systems like ext4 or Xfs. I think in many ways btrfs is the better filesystem, but I seem to have noticed that it takes longer to copy data than on ext4. 4. 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. But. 但无论如何，各个文件系统都需要存储这三类信息，因为这是内核规定的（见下）。. Interestingly, the first version of the Ext4 filesystem, the Extended filesystem (“Ext”), came out in 1992 for the Minix OS. We’ll go over each file system in more detail ahead. To reserve an external journal with a specified size when you create an XFS file system, specify the -l logdev=device,size=size option to the mkfs. There’s very little difference between EXT4 and XFS, both in total throughput and behavior over time. Its OS comes with only one by default (mostly it’s NTFS, FAT 32, or HFS). But shrinking is no problem for ext4 or btrfs. Btrfs is newer and more experimental, but offers advanced capabilities like snapshots, checksums, and inline compression. It is backward-compatible with older versions of Ext. However ZFS does come at one major downside, it needs more resources in just about every way one can imagine, ZFS is best with more disks, more RAM, more CPU, more Bandwidth, more SSD’s for caching…. Ext4 is the default filesystem in Manjaro at the moment. Btrfs is a bit slower with writes because of its Copy-on-write nature, but just as fast when it comes to reads. Resizing (growing) is possible with btrfs and xfs. 4 EXT4 / XFS / Btrfs RAID Performance On Four HDDs Storage : 2019-12-28: Benchmarking The Experimental Bcachefs File-System Against Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS & ZFS Storage : 2019-06-25: Optane SSD RAID Performance With ZFS On Linux, EXT4, XFS, Btrfs, F2FS Storage : 2019-06-20: Linux 5. Yes, both BTRFS and ZFS have advanced features that are missing in EXT4. Also, on ZFS, in Linux, it takes some tweaking to get it performing good, so I would suggest to go btrfs or XFS. Also BRTFS compresses the file system using less space compared to EXT4 but again the tradeoff is it uses more computer. EXT4 es el sistema de archivos más utilizado en sistemas operativos basados en Linux, este sistema de. In this Video we are going to cover Linux File System Types - Ext2,Ext3,Ext4,XFS,BTRFS | Linux File Systems Explained | Linux Tutorial for Beginners #linuxt. Ceph's recommendation for the choice of filesystem is between btrfs and XFS. 挂载 btrfs 文件系统 6. Key Btrfs features Perhaps the most important feature is the checksumming of all data. File-systems tested on the NVMe SSD included Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and NTFS. BtrFS looked promising, but last I checked it still couldn't be trusted in RAID modes. Bcachefs is the file-system born out of the Linux kernel's block cache code and has been worked on the past several years by. The arguments about ext4 vs NTFS have been raging online for decades now. I was using NTFS due to compatibility. Btrfs, EXT4, XFS, F2FS, and NILFS2 were tested on a Linux 5. 8 snapshot as of last week. We currently recommend XFS for production deployments. 其實你提到一個重點了. Page 2 of 2. " And it can be much faster than btrfs, especially with lots of smaller files. 84 nvme drives split up into a small ext4 volume and the rest is btrfs. Server with complex storage needs including redundancy and you need high uptime, and you have the budget. 7 - EXT4 vs. In the time since I chose ext4 for these systems, btrfs seems to have come a long way, so the choice may be harder today. 11. With ZFS ZVOLs, you can run other file systems like ext4 or xfs for special situations (like as storage for VMs) and still get snapshots/block checksumming. Tuy nhiên, đối với phân vùng /home chứa các file cá nhân, openSUSE đã quyết định sử dụng hệ thống file XFS thay thế. EXT4 is better for small files and day to day use. Both filesystems provide COW but XFS fragments less (and it's data cow only so no snapshots, only reflinks). EXT4 Vs XFS. And BRTFS has some really nice features in that area. A Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe 4. The Btrfs partition scheme preset creates an ext4 /boot, and a Btrfs pool. 7 - Btrfs vs. Its not faster or more stable then the other two. Each of the tested file-systems were carried out with the default mount options in an out-of-the-box manner. F2FS, XFS, ext4, zfs, btrfs, ntfs, etc. It was also 164% faster in post-snapshot reads and 17% faster in post-snapshot writes. XFS is very well established and changing slowly, and the same can be said for EXT4. For reducing the size of a filesystem, there are two purported wats forward, according to xfs developers. ext4 is not recommended. btrfs 可以支援 snapshot, 但 ext4 不行, 如果一開始就採用 ext4, 日後如果要使用 snapshot 功能, 必須將 NAS 的資料備份出來, 重新 format 成 btrfs 格式. However, I was using the openSUSE's default partition layout, which is btrfs for / and xfs for /home. The snapshots do not take up any space. Обзор Ext4 vs Btrfs vs XFS. Partition Size: Ext4 supports partition size up to 1 EiB, while Btrfs supports partition size up to 16 EiB. LVM has snapshots. Ext4 has some scalability and performance issues when dealing with large or fragmented files or directories. e. However, BTRFS had significantly better performance with small files than EXT4. . This page is powered by a knowledgeable community that helps you make an informed decision. Here are a few other differences: Features: Btrfs has more advanced features, such as snapshots, data integrity checks, and built-in RAID support. A maximum. but for the shared servers with many users you might consider xfs for the parallel IO and number of files. Tweaking the config is easy if you've figured out how to build and load your own kernel. F2FS vs. 迄今为止，对于桌面系统而言，ext4 似乎是一个更好的选择，因为它是默认的文件系统，传输文件时也比 btrfs 更快。. 多设备的集成卷管理 Expand section "6. Regarding filesystems. In a few words, I just need a really reliable and fast filesystem for years ahead, with the care of SSD in mind, I need it mostly for gaming, video-audio production, working with a lot of small/medium files (from 100-500Kb to 100-150Gb) sending them. Following my post MySQL/ZFS Performance Update, a few people have suggested I should take a look at BTRFS (“butter-FS”, “b-tree FS”) with MySQL. But according to tests in all scenarios, XFS is better than EXT4, it's a pity that there are no tests in games. Checksumming, along with copy-on-write, provides the key method of ensuring file system integrity after unexpected power loss. Both are good file systems. Or btrfs, which is making some serious headway again with it becoming the default filesystem for Fedora. 重新定义 btrfs 文件系统大小 6. (For example, you might have an ext4 root filesystem, but store most of your data on a zfs or btrfs pool. Tùy chọn mặc. The XFS File System. All of these Linux. and. SSD Disk Observations. 2. The fastest for the SATA/USB tests was XFS followed quickly by EXT4 and then F2FS. They perform differently for some specific workloads like creating or deleting tenthousands of files / folders. 14 SSD Benchmarks With Btrfs vs. Như vậy, chúng ta có thể dễ dàng kết hợp các phân vùng định dạng Ext2, Ext3 và Ext4 trong cùng 1 ổ đĩa trong Ubuntu để tăng hiệu suất hoạt động. . But to be honest, it might be easier for me to work around than the lack of the possibility for single-file clone that btrfs, XFS etc. Example 2: ZFS has licensing issues to Distribution-wide support is spotty. A continuación, os vamos a explicar brevemente las principales características de EXT4 y de Btrfs. On the other hand, backup of xfs to xfs allows you certain features that. 2. Its OS comes with only one by default (mostly it’s NTFS, FAT 32, or HFS). Things like snapshots, copy-on-write, checksums and more. We will determine which one is the best ZFS, BTRFS, and EXT4. Its primary developer, Kent Overstreet, first announced it in 2015, and it will be added to the Linux kernel beginning with 6. - no encryption. But according to tests in all scenarios, XFS is better than EXT4, it's a pity that there are no tests in games. 7. The 12,3 % reduction in compilation time with BtrFS is a nice improvement but pales compared to the 58,4 % reduction seen with Ext4 on the same hardware doing the same task. Those curious about the many changes found for the file-systems and other sub-systems within the Linux 3. On the NVMe SSD, the four-thread FS-Mark was the fastest on XFS followed by Btrfs. Ext4 focuses on providing a reliable and stable file system with good performance. XFS is about as mainline as a non-ext filesystem gets under Linux. 8 snapshot as of last week. Januar 2020. 84 nvme drives split up into a small ext4 volume and the rest is btrfs. @taffer Your "recent benchmark" is from April 2015, over three years old and uses XFS with only default options. exFAT is the best choice at the moment. A Red Hat training course is available for RHEL 8. It was later developed for Linux. It you have huge hard drives, BTRFS supports up to 16 times larger size than 1 EXT4 partition. Not only does both file systems feature a more robust data assurances then XFS (the mature fsck for Ext4 and checksums and data. OpenSUSE hiện sử dụng btrfs làm tùy chọn mặc định cho phân vùng /root, nơi đặt hệ điều hành. Uma das decisões que você tem que tomar quando vai instalar qualquer distro Linux é o Sistema de arquivos do Linux! São vários para escolher, EXT4, XFS e BTR. A number of Phoronix readers have been asking about some fresh file-system comparisons on recent kernels. Granted, i just use the automatic partition creater at setup, so it still uses ext4 for the /boot and /boot/efi partitions. The major difference between ext4 and XFS file systems is that the ext4 file system works better for fewer size files (single write/read thread) while the XFS works more efficiently. The btrfs backup multi-disk arrangement, of different disk sizes in single mode was for me a trial of btrfs. El sistema de archivos es mayor de 2 TiB con inodos de 512 bytes. file-system comparison, here are some fresh benchmarks looking at the Btrfs, EXT4,btrfs is also slower in some benchmarks but I very much doubt thats visible in normal use. 4TB HDD formatted as NTFS for backuping all other three hard disks. ZFS likes eating RAM. Như vậy, chúng ta có thể dễ dàng kết hợp các phân vùng định dạng Ext2, Ext3 và Ext4 trong cùng 1 ổ đĩa trong Ubuntu để tăng hiệu suất hoạt động. これらのファイルシステムはEXT4、Btrfs、ZFSであり、XNUMXつのファイルシステムは異なる特性を持ち、いくつかは異なるシナリオでより優れたパフォーマンスを発揮します。 外部4. XFS. 현재 Ext4는 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6의 기본 파일 시스템으로 단일 파일 및 파일 시스템 모두에서 최대 16 TB 크기 까지 지원합니다. Just EXT4, yes. Backups and CoW, are why I use btrfs. zfs or btrfs or ext4. 2 and higher), but only with d_type=true enabled. Even if you do notice. Además, el rendimiento en una sola unidad giratoria generalmente tendrá la unidad como el eslabón más débil. Offizieller Beitrag. However, to be honest, it’s not the best Linux file system comparing to other Linux file systems. For anything with higher capability, XFS tends to be faster. 1 only) xfs (RHEL 7. We may have lengthy talk on ext vs XFS vs f2fs and btrfs vs zfs and there are many more points to be mentioned, but for regular users. Now, lot of development efforts are pushed to Btrfs development and most probably it will become next generation default FS for Linux, a successor of EXT4. File-systems tested on the NVMe SSD included Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and NTFS. A execução do comando quotacheck em um sistema de. From some of the recent Linux kernel patches, it seems some of the most popular Linux file systems, Flash-Friendly File System (F2FS), B-Tree Filesystem (Btrfs), and fourth extended filesystem. Rep: XFS has unbalanced performance, but in the best use case blows away many other formats. webbphillips • 8 mo. However, when we review EXT4 vs BTRFS, here’s the downside: BTRFS has disk and volume management built-in, while EXT4 is a “pure filesystem”. The XFS supports more file sizes and greater file or partition sizes. Hey Guys! Welcome to XPSTECH. 1. EXT4 is very low-hassle, normal journaled filesystem. wbeater • 3 yr. 하지만 리소스 문제나 호환성 등을 생각한다면 EXT4도 포기할 수 없죠. Here are some key differences between them: XFS is a high-performance file system that Silicon Graphics originally developed. for the home lab you can use ext4 it is fast an flexible: grow and shrink are supported. Hello everyone, I can't choose proper filesystem between XFS, ZFS (OpenZFS), BTRFS, F2FS and EXT4. Compared to ext4, XFS has unlimited inode allocation, advanced allocation hinting (if you need it) and, in recent version, reflink support (but they need to be explicitly enabled in.